Files
udpscope/docs/claude/invariants-trigger-and-pinning.md
T

278 lines
22 KiB
Markdown

# Invariants: the trigger, the capture and a pinned view
The four display modes' framing rules: what the event window is counted in, what pins an axis, and what each pin is measured from.
Part of [CLAUDE.md](../../CLAUDE.md). These are rules that cost a defect to learn; read the ones touching the area you are editing before you edit it.
- **`clamp_to_data()` caps the span at the *requested window*, never at the retained
span.** It runs every frame and cannot distinguish "the user zoomed out past the data"
from "the ring has only just started filling", so `window_s_` — what the window control
states, capped by `--max-window` — is the bound. Clamping to `retained` alone turned a
requested 2 s window into the ~0.02 s the first frames held, permanently: nothing there
grows a span back. Loosening it to `max(retained, window_s_)` fixed that and broke the
other state instead — while the ring is filling the two are equal, but once it holds
more than the window the bound becomes the whole ring, and a wheel zoom-out walked the
view into data the window was never set to show. `window_s_` is right in both: it never
shrinks a window a caller asked for, and a partly filled buffer is left empty on its
left, which is what a scope that just started should look like. `UDPSCOPE_PROBE_PAN_MS`
reports it as `zoom ... span=.. window=.. limited=1`.
Its pan clamping is likewise gated on the data being wider than the view, or the empty
left-hand side drags the live edge off the right-hand edge.
- **Signals start disabled** — enabling is what starts acquisition. A trigger on a
signal nobody acquires can never fire, so selecting/arming enables it.
- **The trigger's event window is separate from the display window**, and
`pretrigger_pct` is a share of the *event* span, not of the ring.
- **The event window is counted in stream seconds end to end; nothing converts it to
a sample count.** `TriggerEngine` latches once the stamps it is fed have advanced
past the post window, and `ScopeModel::publish_event()` cuts the snapshot by binary
search over the time ring. There used to be a measured samples-per-second estimate
in `Acquisition` doing that conversion, and it is precisely why the post window came
out empty: any stream whose time signal advances in large steps drove it to its
1 S/s floor, the count came out as 1, and the engine latched on the edge sample
itself. **Do not reintroduce a rate estimate on this path.**
- **The engine identifies its channel by *name*, never by index.** `TriggerEngine::configure()`
drops an open capture when the trigger moves to a different channel, and it is re-called from
`Acquisition::on_data()` on **every packet** out of `model_.trigger()`. `TriggerConfig::channel`
is an index into `channels()`, and that index is not stable: every rebuild of the channel list
renumbers it — enabling a signal that sorts before the trigger's own is enough — and
`ScopeModel::set_signal_enabled()` re-resolves the trigger by name and writes the *new* index
back. Keying the reset on the index therefore made any such rebuild abandon the capture **and
set no hold-off**, so the next edge inside the post window became t0: that is the "the trigger
re-triggers during a capture and the hold-off does not apply" defect, and it needed no glitch
and no user action beyond enabling a channel. The name changes when the source genuinely
changes, so a deliberate re-point still resets. The rebuild also replaces the `BufferStore`, so
the surviving capture's pre side is short and the snapshot reports its own `pre_s` — which may
be **negative** when the new ring starts after the edge. That is a faithful reading, not a
defect: `[-pre_s, post_s]` still describes the samples the snapshot holds. The guard is
`UDPSCOPE_PROBE_TRIGRENUM_MS`, whose `t0_held=1` is the assertion.
- **A pinned window is *clamped* into the event every frame, and a zoom in is allowed.**
While an event is held, a capture is filling, or the view is paused, `tick()` calls
`RowSet::hold_pinned_window()`, which caps the span at `[-pinned_pre_, +pinned_post_]`'s and
clamps the position into it (and states `Off`, since a following group would re-derive from a
live edge). **A zoom in must keep working** -- "not outside the event" is not "not readable",
and this function's first version *re-stated* the pin every frame, which made the wheel a no-op
in single trigger mode: an acquired event could not be examined at all.
**The request is read from the row's own axis, not from the group.** A member's `set_x_range`
-- what the controller writes for a gesture -- is *not* adopted into the group while the follow
is off, so a clamp that read the group only ever saw its own previous answer (the probe showed
`group` and `member` both equal to the pin while the ask was gone). `pinned_stated_` remembers
what the clamp last wrote: a member that matches it is our own answer coming back, one that
differs is a gesture to honour -- which is also what keeps a *fresh* pin
(`pin_event_window()`, `pin_pause_window()`, both of which write the group in the same tick)
from being reverted to the member's stale window. Without it nothing bounds a drag or
a zoom in those states: the library clamps a *following* group's offset only, and the live
clamp is deliberately skipped here — so a gesture walked the frozen view off its axis, over
data the scope never had. The two are one branch in `tick()` for that reason. A paused view
pins the same way (`pin_pause_window()` sets `pinned_` from the frozen range), so the frozen
picture is equally immovable; resuming or leaving trigger mode clears it.
- **A pinned view is navigable *within its data*, and that is the bound -- not the request.**
Two things had to agree for this, and both were wrong in the same direction:
the **pause** pinned on the window it asked for rather than on the snapshot it got (a cut
clamped to the ring is shorter), and the **held event** pinned on the snapshot's recorded
`pre_s`/`post_s` -- the *request* again -- which a capture shorter than the request exceeds.
Either way the shortfall was drawn as an empty margin, and a zoom-in moved the view *into* it,
which is what made it look as if zooming caused it. `tick()` now re-states the pin from
`RowSet::event_data_window()` (the bound **event series'** own stamps) while an event is held,
from the snapshot's stamps on a pause, and `pin_pause_window()`/the pause handler set the axis
to it as well; `[pause-probe]` prints `axis=` beside `frozen_x=` and the axis must lie inside.
A `Capturing` view is the exception and stays on the *requested* `[-pre, +post]`: its post side
is empty on purpose, and that is the capture filling in view, not a margin.
- **A pause is pinned from its snapshot's own stamps too, not from the window it requested.** The
pause freezes the *visible window*, but `publish_pause_view()` cuts that window out of the ring
and the cut is clamped to what the ring holds -- so a window reaching back past the oldest
retained sample produces a *shorter* snapshot. Pinning the axis to the request left the shortfall
as an **empty margin on the left**, visible before any zoom and made worse by one: zooming in
moved the view *into* the empty part, which is what made it look as if zooming caused it. The pin
is the snapshot's own stamps now. `[pause-probe]` prints `axis=` beside `frozen_x=`, and while
paused **the axis must lie inside `frozen_x`** -- equal at the moment of the pause, a subset
afterwards if the probe zoomed in. Before the fix the two disagreed outright:
`axis=[-1.44..0.56]` over data that started at `0.0`. (The event pin already worked this way; the
pause now agrees.)
- **The event axis is pinned from the snapshot's own stamps, not from the request.** A
capture may legitimately be shorter than asked for — the ring need not reach back a
full pre-trigger share on the first latch after arming, so `snap=[-0.339..1.000]`
for a ±1 s request is correct there rather than a defect.
- **The frame that *frames* a snapshot is the one that consumes its `event_seq()`.** The
tick reads `display_mode()` *before* it takes `mutex()`, while the producer publishes
inside that mutex and lowers `trigger_pending` only at the end of its packet — so a tick
can read `Capturing`, block on the lock through `publish_event()`, and reach the framing
step with a new sequence number it is not bound to. (The other case is benign and was
always handled: a publication and the *next* edge in one frame, where the capture has
framed its own window.) Advancing `seen_event_seq` on such a frame dropped the pin
permanently — the axis kept the capture's requested `[-pre, +post]` over a shorter
snapshot and `event_held` stayed false, letting `clamp_to_data()` drag the frozen view —
so the test is `seq != seen_event_seq && display == Held` and the pin stays owed until a
frame is bound to the snapshot. Visible only at high rates, where the publish is long
enough to lose the race often; `[disarm-probe]`'s `axis=` against `snap=` is the guard,
which means **running the disarm probe at 10 kS/s alone does not check this.**
- **A capture in progress is the one place the axis is pinned from the *request*.** There
is no snapshot to measure yet, so `DisplayMode::Capturing` frames
`[-(span - post_span_s(span)), +post_span_s(span)]` — computed with the producer's own
`TriggerConfig::post_span_s()`, not a second expression that rounds differently, because
the marker at x = 0 has to land where the coming cut will put it. The latch then re-pins
from the snapshot, and the two agreeing is why the picture does not jump at the latch.
- **`clamp_to_data()` must be skipped while `capturing` as well as while `event_held`.**
A capture is live data on a pinned axis — the exact combination the clamp was written
for and against: it would follow the live edge and drag the frozen window off the event.
- **`publish_event()` cuts one absolute index range and uses it for the time ring and
every value ring.** That is what makes `stamps` and each `values[c]` equal-length
and index-aligned by construction instead of by two truncations that can disagree —
`EventSeries::gather()` indexes both at the same `i`.
- **`live_window_locked()` is the one live cut, shared by `publish_event()` and the
export.** Both need the same absolute index range over the time ring and every value
ring, or an export and a capture of the same window would hold different samples. Call
it under `mutex()`.
- **The trigger engine is not fed a reserved hole's samples.** A NaN comparison is false anyway,
so the engine would not latch; but the real reason the samples are withheld is the other one:
feeding them would advance the hold-off clock across time nothing was sampled in. The probe
asserts `trigger_in_hole=0` rather than relying on NaN's arithmetic properties.
- **`EventDetector` owns every condition shape and holds no arming state; `TriggerEngine` owns
the arming, the hold-off and the post window and holds no condition.** The split is what lets
the buffer search ask the trigger's exact question without owning a trigger, and it is only
true as long as neither half leaks into the other: a detector that knew about the hold-off
would answer a search differently from the live trigger, which is the one thing the
`agree=1` cross-check in `[search-probe]` exists to catch.
- **The detector is fed on *every* sample, including during the hold-off and during a capture.**
A pulse width, a window excursion and a dropout timeout are all *stateful over several
samples*: skipping the feed while the engine is busy loses the opening edge, and the condition
then measures from whatever sample the engine happened to resume on. The hold-off is applied
to the detector's *answer*, not to its input — `process()` feeds first and tests
`now_s < holdoff_until_s_` afterwards.
- **An event's time is the detector's, not the sample's.** A pulse-width event is detected at
the closing edge but could in principle be timed at the opening one, and a dropout is detected
one sample after the timeout expires. `feed()` therefore returns the event's *own* time and
`process()` uses that for `last_trigger_s_`, `pending_start_s_` **and** the pre-window gate —
all three, or the marker, the cut and the gate would disagree with each other by the width of
a pulse.
## A latch is also a file
The pane that lists the cache is **on demand**: the toolbar's event-history button and the pane are
collapsed until it is asked for, because a column of stale events beside a live plot is what a user
who has stopped looking at events does not want. What makes it *available* -- (recording is on) or
(an event is on screen) -- is decided in one place, `sync_events_availability()`, so the button and
the pane cannot disagree; a disabled cache with nothing being examined takes the button away *and*
collapses the pane, because a visible empty column is what "off" must not look like. Trigger mode is
deliberately **not** one of the conditions: a stored event being examined is a file, which has no
trigger, and tying the pane to the trigger would close the list under the click that opened an event.
The recording switch lives in the trigger panel, not in the pane it empties.
## A comparison is two plots of one model
*Compare* and *accumulate* are still one model -- the buffers cannot hold two independent loads -- but a
comparison is **two plots** over it, and which plot draws what is only a matter of which channel *names*
its rows bind. `App::rows` is the primary (`RowSet`, area, gestures); `App::rows_b` is the second, with
its own `RowSet` and its own hidden `PlotArea` in a paned, deliberately without the drop target, the
right-click menu or the frame counter: those act on the primary's rows, and a menu on the second plot
that rearranged the first plot's rows would be a menu lying about its subject.
Rules that cost a defect each:
- **The layout is the user's and is mirrored, never reinvented.** The group build must not call
`set_row_count()`; it reads the rows' slot names and re-names the same slots for each layer
(`… (A)`, `… (B)` for a comparison; a bare name for layer 0 and `… #2`, `… #3` for the extra layers of
an accumulation). An *accumulation* puts its extra layers into free slots -- the row that holds the
signal first, then any row with room -- so the user's traces never move. The default layout is four
signals in one row, which is why `kSlotsPerRow` is 8: with four, "accumulate these two events" had
nowhere to put the second copy and silently did nothing.
- **A layer is not a signal.** A comparison's model holds one channel per (signal, layer), and the
*panel* must not treat the copies as signals of their own: the signal list shows one row per signal
(`layer_base_name()`, the shared rule that takes `(A)`, `(B)` and `#N` back off), `signal_color_index()`
counts *signals* and not channels -- counting channels spread one signal's colour across the palette
-- and both plots of a comparison bind their signal's layers to the *same* colour index, because two
colours would say they were different signals. The reading is `list=4` in `[events] compare plots`
for a two-event comparison of four signals.
- **A slot name carries the last group's suffix, so it must be stripped before it is re-derived**:
after a comparison the rows are named `sine (A)`, and a following accumulation that mapped that name
again bound to no channel at all (`traces0=0`, a plot with nothing in it). `base_name()` takes
`(A)`, `(B)` and `#N` back off.
- **The axes are mirrored from the ranges, once per frame.** The plotter owns its window and a gesture
reaches it through the plot's own setter with nothing announcing it, so the frame compares each row's
signature with the previous frame's: whichever side moved is the side the user touched, and the other
is set to match. The signature is `{span, y.min, y.max}` when the x axis has a **live edge**
(`x_live_edge()`, not merely an armed follow: an armed axis with nothing streaming keeps a *stored*
window, whose edges a pan moves and whose span never changes) and `{x.min, x.max, y.min, y.max}`
otherwise. Comparing the edges under a live edge would read as "both sides moved" on every frame --
the window is recomputed as a distance behind the newest sample -- and a zoom in one plot would be
overwritten by the other's drift. When both moved the first plot is the reference, which is also what
makes the frame after a build converge.
- **`set_y_range()` clears that axis' auto-scale**, by design: a mirrored zoom is a user decision, and
*Fit* re-arms it.
## A group of events is one model, built once
*Compare* and *accumulate* are the same machinery: several event files in **one** model, because the
buffers cannot hold two independent loads -- `load_waveform_into_model` calls `set_signals()`, which
rebuilds them, so a second load takes the first with it. So the group is built by hand: one channel per
(signal, layer) pair, `set_target_span()` to cover the whole group *before* `set_signals()` (or the
oldest samples are written past the ring's end), then all of the events pushed in one pass. A row is
one **signal** and its slots are the events, which is what makes a comparison like for like and an
accumulation a density; the trace alpha (0.35 while accumulating, 1 otherwise) is what turns agreement
into brightness.
Two things every group must do, both of which cost a defect to learn:
- **Stop the acquisition first.** A live producer keeps pushing into the model it was started with --
and it pushes *four* stream signals into the group's *eight* channels, so the group's own samples are
the ones that go missing. The reading that catches it is the samples the busy channel holds
(`samples0` in the `[events] compare` line): it must be exactly the number of stamps pushed, not
that plus whatever the stream added.
- **Free the slots the group does not fill.** A row carries the previous view's binding, and a trace
left in slot 2 of a two-layer row is drawn as if it belonged to the group.
*Compare* shifts the first event so its span *ends* where the second's *begins*, and fills the half a
sample does not belong to with **NaN** -- the plotter excludes non-finite samples from every series and
from every pyramid bucket, so a NaN is a gap and not a repeat, and no line is drawn across the join.
**A replay changes the data and frames it once; it never rearranges the layout.** A row plots a signal
*name*, and an event's export carries the same names the stream does, so loading the event into the
model leaves every row, slot, colour and the row count pointing at the right signal by itself. So
`replay_event()` must **not** rebind the rows (`bind_channels_to_rows()`, which is what a freshly opened
*file* needs) -- that is the user's work, and a click on a list is not a request to rearrange it. The
window is restated **once, on open** (`apply_time_window(span)`, the only path allowed to change the
scale), so the whole event is framed the moment it is opened and the user's own zooms are left alone
afterwards; never per frame. The measurements, the cursors and the readouts then report the stored
event, because they read the model. What a replay *does* change is the model's contents and the trigger:
it leaves trigger mode, without which the display stays `Held` and draws the old snapshot.
**A file view has nothing to acquire.** The signal list's acquire tick is *hidden* -- not disabled --
whenever a file is on screen (`App::waveform_name` non-empty: a replay, a comparison, a `--open`run).
The samples are stored, "acquire this signal" is a stream's question, and a greyed tick invites the user
to look for a reason there is none for. Going live rebuilds the panel, so the ticks come back.
**"The same length" is the same count at the same rate, not the same span to the sample.** Two events
this app recorded itself differ in span by the fraction of a sample the acquisition's window happened to
fill to (0.9999 s of a 1 s pre-window is normal). Demanding one sample interval made a comparison of two
just-recorded events refuse to open; the check allows four intervals or a millisecond, whichever is
larger, and the merged stamp grid carries the difference as a gap.
**A replay must leave trigger mode.** `display_mode()` answers `Held` whenever the model holds a
snapshot, and a held display draws *the snapshot*, not the live channels -- so replaying an event with
trigger mode still armed loaded the file into the model and left the old capture on screen: a click
that looks like it did nothing, with the event sitting in the ring unread. The replay also frames the
view with `apply_time_window(report.span_s)`, so the click shows the whole event rather than the part
of it that fell inside the live window.
The switch that decides recording belongs to the **trigger panel**, not to the pane it empties: it
is a trigger option (it decides whether a latch is written at all), and a pane must not be the only
place to reach the control that stops it.
Every published snapshot is written to the event cache while recording is on: its table (the *export*
format, so `--open` reads it back), a sidecar of what the list shows, and a preview drawn from the
samples. Three rules keep that honest:
- **The record happens on the GTK thread, at the end of the tick that framed the snapshot**, not on
the producer. The snapshot is taken by `shared_ptr` (a latch landing mid-write cannot pull the data
away), and a `record_pending` flag defers the write to the end of the frame so the rows are already
bound to the event when the picture is drawn. Recording from the producer would put file I/O
between two `recv()` calls, which is the one thing the packet capture's design also refuses.
- **Nothing a latch does may be expensive.** The write is a `write_npy` of the event's own window and
a 480x160 raster; a 2 s, four-channel event is ~230 kB of picture and ~600 kB of samples. The pane
is refreshed, not rebuilt, and a failure to write is a line on stderr -- a cache that cannot be
written must not stop the scope.
- **The preview is drawn from the data, never captured from the window.** The plot is a `GtkGLArea`:
its ink is not in the widget's paint tree, so `gtk_snapshot_free_to_node()` on a widget paintable of
it returns NULL and the "screenshot" would be an empty file. Drawing it in the store also keeps that
class GTK-free, which is what makes the cache testable without a window.