cover_buckets chose one level per pass, so an odd first whole bucket (half of all measurement ranges) never reached a level above 0 and folded every remaining bucket at level 0 -- 15624 entries for a 1e6-sample pyramid. Pick the largest aligned, in-range, materialised level at each cursor instead; the new cost test counts folded entries through a PLOT_PYRAMID_COUNT_COVERS-only hook (absent from normal builds) and fails on the old body. Ring slots are now relaxed std::atomic: overwrite-on-full means the producer reuses the slot of a snapshot's oldest sample while the consumer reads it, which was a data race, not just a stale value. copy_from loads explicitly instead of std::copy; push stays lock-free. A new producer/consumer case is the one TSan flags without this. Also extends the wrapped-window test with x0/bounds/pyramid/sum/sumsq/gather checks, and corrects the StreamSeries threading note to the sample-count bound.
131 lines
4.5 KiB
C++
131 lines
4.5 KiB
C++
#include "harness.hpp"
|
|
#include <plot/data/array_series.hpp>
|
|
#include <plot/data/stream_series.hpp>
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
#include <cmath>
|
|
#include <random>
|
|
#include <thread>
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
PLOT_TEST(array_series_bounds_and_gather) {
|
|
std::vector<f32> y{1, 5, -2, 3};
|
|
plot::data::ArraySeries s(std::move(y), /*x0=*/10.0, /*dx=*/0.5);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(s.size() == 4);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.x_bounds().min, 10.0, 1e-9);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.x_bounds().max, 11.5, 1e-9);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.y_bounds().min, -2.0, 1e-6);
|
|
std::vector<f32> out;
|
|
s.gather(0, 0, 4, out);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(out.size() == 8); // interleaved x,y
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(out[0], 10.0, 1e-6);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(out[1], 1.0, 1e-6);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(out[6], 11.5, 1e-6);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PLOT_TEST(stream_series_acquire_publishes_snapshot) {
|
|
plot::data::StreamSeries s(1 << 12, /*x0=*/0.0, /*dx=*/1e-6);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) s.push(f32(i));
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(s.produced() == 100);
|
|
s.acquire();
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(s.size() == 100);
|
|
// Pyramid must track the published samples.
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.pyramid().reduce(0, 100).max, 99.0, 1e-4);
|
|
for (int i = 100; i < 250; ++i) s.push(f32(i));
|
|
s.acquire();
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(s.size() == 250);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PLOT_TEST(stream_series_drops_oldest_when_full) {
|
|
plot::data::StreamSeries s(256, 0.0, 1.0);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) s.push(f32(i));
|
|
s.acquire();
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(s.size() <= 256);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.y_bounds().max, 999.0, 1e-4);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PLOT_TEST(array_series_exact_range_queries_match_bruteforce) {
|
|
// The strong test for the exactness split: arbitrary, deliberately
|
|
// unaligned ranges must match a brute-force scan of the raw samples.
|
|
std::mt19937 rng(7);
|
|
std::uniform_real_distribution<float> d(-5.0f, 5.0f);
|
|
std::vector<f32> y(4000);
|
|
for (auto& v : y) v = d(rng);
|
|
plot::data::ArraySeries s(y, 0.0, 1.0);
|
|
for (u64 a = 0; a < 4000; a += 173) {
|
|
for (u64 b = a + 1; b <= 4000; b += 331) {
|
|
float lo = y[a], hi = y[a];
|
|
double sum = 0.0, sq = 0.0;
|
|
for (u64 i = a; i < b; ++i) {
|
|
lo = std::min(lo, y[i]); hi = std::max(hi, y[i]);
|
|
sum += y[i]; sq += double(y[i]) * double(y[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
const plot::Range r = s.reduce(a, b);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(r.min, lo, 1e-4);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(r.max, hi, 1e-4);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.sum(a, b), sum, 1e-2);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.sumsq(a, b), sq, 1e-1);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PLOT_TEST(stream_series_exact_queries_survive_ring_wrap) {
|
|
plot::data::StreamSeries s(1u << 10, 0.0, 1.0);
|
|
constexpr u64 kPushes = 3000;
|
|
constexpr u64 kFirstRetained = kPushes - (1u << 10); // 1976
|
|
for (u64 i = 0; i < kPushes; ++i) s.push(f32(i % 97)); // wraps the ring twice
|
|
s.acquire();
|
|
const u64 n = s.size();
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(n == 1u << 10);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.x0(), 1976.0, 1e-9);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(s.x_bounds().min == s.x0());
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(s.pyramid().size() == n);
|
|
|
|
const plot::Range r = s.reduce(0, n); // retained window, wrapped
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(r.max, 96.0, 1e-4);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(r.min, 0.0, 1e-4);
|
|
|
|
double sum = 0.0, sumsq = 0.0;
|
|
for (u64 i = kFirstRetained; i < kPushes; ++i) {
|
|
const double v = static_cast<double>(i % 97);
|
|
sum += v;
|
|
sumsq += v * v;
|
|
}
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.sum(0, n), sum, 1e-2);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(s.sumsq(0, n), sumsq, 1e-1);
|
|
|
|
std::vector<f32> out;
|
|
s.gather(0, 0, n, out); // level 0: raw samples
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(out.size() == 2 * n);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(out[0], s.x0(), 1e-6);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(out[1], f32(kFirstRetained % 97), 1e-6);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK_NEAR(out[2 * n - 2], s.x0() + f64(n - 1), 1e-6);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PLOT_TEST(stream_series_push_and_read_are_race_free) {
|
|
// The ring overwrites, so the producer reuses the slot of the snapshot's oldest
|
|
// retained sample while the consumer may still be reading it. Relaxed atomic
|
|
// slots make that defined; nothing else in the suite has two threads, so this
|
|
// is the case ThreadSanitizer actually flags when that is not the case.
|
|
plot::data::StreamSeries s(1u << 8, 0.0, 1.0);
|
|
constexpr u64 kPushes = 50'000;
|
|
std::thread producer([&s] {
|
|
for (u64 i = 0; i < kPushes; ++i) s.push(f32(i % 971));
|
|
});
|
|
u64 reads = 0;
|
|
while (s.produced() < kPushes) {
|
|
s.acquire();
|
|
const u64 n = s.size();
|
|
if (n == 0) continue;
|
|
(void)s.reduce(0, n);
|
|
(void)s.sum(0, n);
|
|
(void)s.sumsq(0, n);
|
|
std::vector<f32> out;
|
|
s.gather(0, 0, n, out); // reads the oldest edge
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(out.size() == 2 * n);
|
|
++reads;
|
|
}
|
|
producer.join();
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(s.produced() == kPushes);
|
|
PLOT_CHECK(reads > 0);
|
|
}
|