The symptom was "view a recorded event, click `<live>`, then toggle the trigger a few times before it
starts streaming again". The mechanism was the restore's own gate: `restore_live_state()` waits for the
*stream's* channel list, because the trigger's stored channel is a **name** and a file view that renamed its
channels (`square (A)`) must be gone before the name means the right signal — and that wait was gated on
`generation()` having moved since *Go live* was pressed.
That gate could never be satisfied in the common case. A **single** event keeps the stream's own channel
names, and the restarted client's CONFIG is identical — which the model treats as *no change on purpose*
(`same_stream_signals()`: "the honest recovery is nothing") — so nothing bumped the generation and the
restore sat there. Toggling the trigger *is* a structural change and moved it, which is exactly the
workaround the report describes.
The gate is now the question it was actually asking: is the snapshot's channel name resolvable against the
live channels (or did the snapshot name none)? For a single event that is true as soon as the client has a
channel list at all, so going live is immediate; for a group the names are renamed, so it waits for the
stream's own CONFIG exactly as before — which is what the gate was for. `live_restore_generation` is still
captured and printed (`gen=a/b`) as information, not as the gate.
Verified against the documented reading, both ways into a file view, from a session with a window and a
trigger so the paired fields have something to disagree with:
[events] live restored (after replay): window=0.500000 (want 0.500000) trigger=1 (want 1) channel='square' (want 'square') level=0 (want 0) enabled=1 armed=1 pinned=0 held=0 mode=2 pending=0 gen=6/3
[events] live restored (after a group): window=0.500000 (want 0.500000) trigger=1 (want 1) channel='square' (want 'square') level=0 (want 0) enabled=1 armed=1 pinned=0 held=0 mode=2 pending=0 gen=16/12
Every want satisfied, `pending=0` in both, `make test-ui` 14 files, zero `Gtk-CRITICAL`. Docs: the
invariants' bullet rewritten around what the restore waits for and why the generation was the wrong
question, and `probe-readings.md` gaining the thing that cost me two runs to find — those four paired
fields are the probe's capture of the live view, so a bare first run reads the application's defaults and
is not a defect; reproduce the documented line from a session that has a window and a trigger.
Martino Ferrari
4e29b958a2