perf: a measurement pane is priced by its window, and its fold is inline

A pane is recomputed over the whole visible window on a cadence, and at a 15 s window
(11.8 M samples, 184 k level-0 level buckets, `--buffer-mb 4000` so the stride stays 1)
that is priced per *measured channel* and per *distinct share*. Measured with the new
`[levels-probe]` sweep, per recompute: one window with one level 6.58 ms, four shares
10.28 ms, sixteen shares 24.55 ms, and four measurements one share each over four
channels **35.69 ms** -- against a tick mean of 1.34 ms with an empty pane and 4.58 ms
with that one. That is the reported "very slow with multiple measurements": the pass
runs inside `tick()`, so it is a *frame* cost, and not an ingest one -- `gaps` and
`packets` stay clean even though each `MeasureWindowReader` holds the model mutex for
its whole life, because a socket buffer absorbs a few tens of milliseconds of producer.

The largest single term inside a pass was a call. `measure_accumulate_bucket()` folds
one bucket into one level, and it is the innermost loop of a walk whose iteration count
is the window's buckets *times* the pane's levels; it lived out of line in
`measure.cpp`, so every one of those iterations was a cross-translation-unit call.
Moving it, and the crossing state it updates, into `measure.hpp` as `inline` takes
sixteen shares on one channel from 24.55 to **17.25 ms** a recompute -- with every value
in the dump's `measurements:` unchanged. Two levers remain and both are measured: the
fetch's three out-of-line pyramid accessors plus a 48-byte copy per bucket (3.3 ms of an
11.8 M-sample window's 11.6 ms pass) needs a combined accessor upstream, and `raw` is
the *signal's* share (4.6 % on the mock's noisy channel against 0.1 % on its sine),
because a level inside a bucket's own `[lo, hi]` has to be walked sample by sample.

Bisected with the pane populated (the earlier bisect had it empty, which cannot see
this): the parent of the recent range and HEAD read **8.29** and **7.92 ms** a
recompute for the same four-type pane at the same window, and neither of the two
commits between them touches `ui_measure.cpp` or `measure.cpp` at all. So the cost is
the scale and not a regression, and the fix makes a pass cheaper rather than removing
one -- the plot's own per-frame cost was checked the same way (four commits, equal
within 3 %, and unchanged by the window, the ring size and the visible sample count).

`UDPSCOPE_PROBE_LEVELS_MS` with `UDPSCOPE_PROBE_LEVELS` and
`UDPSCOPE_PROBE_LEVELS_CHANNELS` is the sweep; `docs/claude/invariants-measurements.md`
records the curve and the inline rule, `verification.md` and `probe-readings.md` the
probe and what its numbers must read, and the README the pane's cost at this scale.

src/ui.cpp

@@ -5831,6 +5831,9 @@ int run_ui(int argc, char** argv, const Config& cfg, ScopeModel& model, Acquisit
   if (const char* env = g_getenv("UDPSCOPE_PROBE_MEASURE_MS")) {
     g_timeout_add(static_cast<guint>(std::atoi(env)), measure_probe, &app);
   }
+  if (const char* env = g_getenv("UDPSCOPE_PROBE_LEVELS_MS")) {
+    g_timeout_add(static_cast<guint>(std::atoi(env)), levels_probe, &app);
+  }
   if (const char* env = g_getenv("UDPSCOPE_PROBE_MEASUREPIN_MS")) {
     g_timeout_add(static_cast<guint>(std::atoi(env)), measurepin_probe, &app);
   }